If it had a slight ranged deployable placement range (of say 10-20 units), it would require less endurance on bariks behalf for optimal placement around terrain and off of a high ground onto a lower platform within range..

As long as the range is not too far, that small placement flexibility buff in itself would be choice in giving a bit more extension into enemy ground potential from a standstill.

As for design overhauls.

Turret is pretty core to the theme of the kit.
Provides a body block vs non foe piercing brawler attacks as a subtle hint to the power of a smaller character size.
Its firepower mechanics are lacking somewhat due to design. Not to say it does not do the job of creating CQC damage pressure... It just could be better in design to have more influence.

I would opt for a channelled beam turret, laser targets nearest foe then arcs to the nearest foe nearby, chaining across the whole enemy team if they are too close (say 20 units), dealing less damage the further it chains. This turret design would do better to split foes apart to avoid chaining damage to each other, yet hindering their ability to form up close to each other for defence.
So not only is your team protected behind a shield, foes entering that shield will could cause a potential team wide multi foe CQC backlash dependant on how many foes want to stick around that shield.

Or a gatling gun with extreme falloff or inaccuracy at max range to provide more range and offence rather then only in tight spaces, limited to the shield area. However barrier and sentry combos are a pain to deal with and the current barrier strength would see it too strong to deal with without some duration or value drawbacks..

Without turret, it could just be a static Bubble Barrier and Damage Over Time field, but without the turret, I can't really see barik the same way.
I like THUNDERDOME's in general...
But it should be another characters ult.

As for soft vs hard CC on ult.
Any Hard CC stun or silence would provide an at the ready ability counter against channelled defence abilities and would afford barik much counterplay to a character in a defence state.

I would rather opt for a weak 40% Slow Zone, Damage over time and Mid strength Bubble Shield. A good ult for a front line class as it has all elements of defence, offence and control without any extremes, allowing it to be deployed at range without any instant combat overwhelm influence potential. I wish we had more elegant defensive ult design, front lines have mostly gone for direct combat influence ults, whereas environmental defence and offence have impact if they are designed right.

I'm not the biggest fan of simple direct influence ability counterplay, if done poorly the game thrives on clutch ability outplay options rather then performance skill.
If not balanced overall, ability outplay can create too strong dive and shut down moves.

I am surprised we have not seen another double barrier set up on a tank tbh.

@M3RC3N4RI0 said in If the People Want Barik Buffs...:

@Dusklicious said in If the People Want Barik Buffs...:

With a single turret. 250/sec for this new idea requires both to be up and you to be in the AoE of both.

That would require a more defensive turret placement probably, question is if this would be an improvement in his play-style.

I mean it would require you to place your turrets so they sustain better so you can get more out of them. But even then with Archi they have a 7 second CD, plus Forged Alloy exists.

Well I cannot really argue with most design alterations.

A dome shield and active movement, can be like having two walls of defence. Trying to chase through it can be a hasstle. But half shell exists so its not bad... but to have two domes on hand.... with no cd gap idk.... thats a lot of cover.

All I think about with fortify is that there is no harming or utility barriers in the game.

If a slow of sorts was applied to targets who walk though it, then barik would have some dive protection vs foes who just dash through the barrier.
By that design you could just walk upto people with a slow by deploying your shield on them and that seems like a pretty jank use for it, thus why I do not oft talk about the idea.

Another idea for shield utility, fortify amps ally damage passing through it. Therefore you can have your shield wall to amp whatever is stacked behind, allies or turrets.

I had a thought that tink could pierce through up to 1 additional target at the expense of dealing less damage after it penetrates the initial target.

Weapon attack penetration could be beneficial to apply caut, and hold a corridor vs stacking and make up for a lack of caut application from slugs.

Personally I hate weapon attack talents in their current state esp tink.

@TTraw said in Barik Card Tier List:

I have a question sir!

Why is Double time better than Bowling Ball? Bowling Ball seems much better considering that wrecker is way weaker than cauterize, and also comes out instantenously for a much clutcher save?

Theoretically, that argument is sensible, however in practice it doesn't really work that way.

The issue with Bowling Ball is that you don't even need Wrecker to deal with it. In the days it used to be good it actually made you get Wrecker for it. But now most characters that do half decent damage can just shoot at it with no Wrecker and poof the shield is down. Cauted Double Time will still provide sustain while it's healing you 20/sec at Caut 3 instead of Bowling Ball where you just lose all the sustain from the card when the shield is destroyed.

And even then it isn't like Cauterize increases the damage dealt to health like Wrecker does to shields. If Caut did that, then yeah Bowling Ball likely would be straight-up better because you'd have to burst it down. But both would suck at that point and Caut would be busted.

I have published the video.

After all I have to start somewhere even if it is with low quality content. May also do one each for Terminus, Raum, and Ash at some point. Though they'll likely be shorter in length than this.