All Supports should have their healing buffed three hundred percent. The last couple of nights, while playing Team Deathmatch, a teammate's Support was working on overdrive and could not heal the team fast enough. All of the time, while I was at one end of each map and they were at the other, their heals could never reach me. Luckily, if I didn't manage to self -heal (slap on a bandage), I would have died more often.

And speaking about self-healing, can be buffed two hundred percent, or at least nerf the power of all character's autofire weapons? Man, I hate having to rely on another person to not die in a game.

No one hundred people will agree on the same buffs and nerfs of every Champion. That is a fact.

Our game is alive and ever changing. It will always change.

Seriously, I do believe the strengths and weaknesses of each character is always changing to suit new characters, new maps snd new challenges. And I also believe that it is up to the players to figure out how to work with those changes via the characters they play and how they play with their teams. Once we get used to how a favorite character works, don't get used to it as it may change with new additions to the game. I've seen teams with the "strongest" characters lose and the teams with the "weakest" chgaracters win. And I've seen it reversed. What made the difference? The players, you and me. How we played and interacted with our teammates. How we communicated. And our personal skill and ecperience with out characters and their roles within the game.

I may be in the minority, or even the only person who believes this, but we are the balance.

We are the balance.

@Radioxyss said in Cancer champions:

@Conrad_Max yep, but i have to admit that in this weeks i had such a good team mates, that talks in chat etc.
saying gg
picking tanks, healers in quick plays
This is the best paladins year ^^

Recently I had three consecutive Siege games where our team did all of the above (that I had mentioned). The first two games were very good and which we had won. With the third game, we were against a team that quite obviously were playing as a fully cohesive team. That game went on a long time with both teams attacking and countering equally. I don't remember which team eventually won, but it didn't really matter. That game was more than just good. It was a very challenging and fun match. Whether we won or lost it was a great battle and was very enjoyable. One of the best in my Paladins career.

A match can be great when both teams are good no matter the outcome.

The only "cancer" are players who don't understand that this is a team based game and if we want more consistant wins we must know our roles, communicate more, strategize and learn to work together in spite of our differing play styles and language barriers.

We can have the most powerful characters in the game, but that may not help us when we face teams with the qualities listed above.

An option to surrender a match will end up upsetting players who want to complete nightly and personal goals, along with upsetting people who are tired of long waits and only want to play a few matches for a couple of uninterrupted hours.

Surrendering is a selfish act, without considering the feelings of players on both teams. If anyone wants out, simply quit and accept the fallout.

My last entry into this conversation.

With all of the alleged technical issues with this game, do we really want to risk adding more to it? Why complicate our favorite game even more?

Ten-four, Eleanor. Over and out.

@M3RC3N4RI0

Oh my God.

Having a name that is easily pronounced and remember can have it's positive side. Often a person with an easily remembered name will be invited to join a game or they be sought out for advice. When I created "Conrad Max" back in the Summer of '73, I wanted it to be strong, mysterious and remembered. Well, one of those things came true.

So, it could be both good and bad having an easily remembered name. But what finally makes a difference it how we act and react with our gsming/internet identity. With that said, our chosen name can have do much meaning and impact with the people we meet in our favorite hobby.

@M3RC3N4RI0 said in Option to disable skins?:

But they have no way to tell how the others see them, so nothing would change for them.

What? People have mentioned and even complimented me on my skin(s). Some have said that they remembered me using the skin(s) before. Clearly they can see the skin(s) that I use.

Personally, and I may be the only person who believes this, I think this is a bad idea. And the reason is quite simple. People work hard, play hard and maybe even spend money to have skins that represent their personalities or how they feel at the moment. Basically, they want to be seen or recognized by others. Additionally, they want to be able to personalize and customize thrir characters so that tbey do not look like eveyone else's characters. Not having this, or disabling the ability for others to see their differnt skins, would make the skins valueless and a waste of time and money. Why would anyone work or pay for a skin that no one else can see?

Lastly, our skins also represent our advancement and accomplishments. They can mean our success and progress. And skins may attract new players and can be the reason for some of us to keep playing.

I like some of the skins I that have and I want people to notice and remember my paladins.

Some people complain about too many skins being released while others complain about not enough are available. Apparently Hi-Rez Studios is failing in keeping everyone happy?

On a personal note, I am okay with the way things are. I like the challenge, the gamble, the direct purchase and the win route of this game. I like to be surprised. And Hi-Rez surprises me a lot.