You say ultimates should be game changers ? Well Evie's ulti is not it is too weak. Lets compare it with Tyra's "Fire Bomb" which actually better version of Evie's ulti.
Fire bomb does NOT slow. One can simply walk out of it.
Yet you calling this ulti op ?
No. I call the fact that she can spam her ult OP. Even Buck ult would be OP if he could do it every 20 seconds.
Evie gets %6 ulti charge with a DIRECT HIT which means she can recharge her ulti at 17 seconds theorically (with only hits disregarding passive charge). 10 seconds you say ? Maybe you forgot to add you were using Lvl 3 Moral Boost ?
Maybe you forgot she only needs 50% charge to ult with snow globe?
This topic should be deleted. Because it is obvious owner is quite biased aganist Evie. Doesnt want to admit that he was bested by a better player. This topic is not constructive.
If the Talent is that shitty as you explained so eloquently shouldn't you be glad if it is removed?
Also from my point of view 90% of people complaining about a character in every game is people than dont want to admit that they got outskilled/outsmarted, probably the case in this thread
From my point of view 95% of people who get personal in a balancing discussion are fanboys of said champion. The Evie did what TangAce described.
I only use it against champs like maeve to just focus on them whole game long cause I hate this champ
Question is, if the idea of an ult is to bully another champ by constantly ulting them. Or if this is described well as "outsmart".